For anyone contemplating change from the recent election you will be sadly disappointed. There will only be more of the same delusional expectations galvanized by obstinate, implacable entitlement. The comments made to the press by Woodhouse were intentionally threatening empowered by a history of acquiescence from a sycophantic incompetent government. Pandering to a stone age mentality improves nothing and helps no one. Fair and realistic limits need to be established for the Queen's children and the pandering must end. We can no longer afford for the tail to wag the dog.
The line that is most memorable for me in this excellent article is, "PET famously - and vindictively - retorted, ‘We’ll let them stay in their ghettos for as long as they want.’"
The indigenous live off others to a great extent and aim to be owners of the land and lords of each manor. All those who favour special rights for this racial group are mischievous at best.
That is a Claymore mine. I thought peopel would generally be familiar with it. It's an anti-personnel mine triggered by a trip wire. It is packed with ball nearings and when it explodes, the ball bearing burst out in one direction. Very nasty device.
Here I will put on my antipersonnel mine ban treaty hat, and note that claymore mines are not covered by the landmine treaty because they (can be) triggered by a “man-in-the-loop” (I.e. command activation) and are not to be used as victim-activated trip-wired weapons if compliant with the treaty. Thus they are set off by solders on watch for enemy soldiers. (All other APMs are otherwise victim-activated, which is what makes this variety somewhat unique.) But you are right that they can be used “illegally” unless altered so that they are not trip-wired. This is what Ottawa treaty militaries are obliged to do if they keep them in inventory.
I bet you’ve been dying to use this one for some time, “obsessed with oikophobia and governments paralyzed by Okaphobia”. ;-)
No, that one was cooked up fresh for my readers.
I also liked “people will start asking if the money spent on keeping the AFN in conferences and costumes would be better spent elsewhere.”
For anyone contemplating change from the recent election you will be sadly disappointed. There will only be more of the same delusional expectations galvanized by obstinate, implacable entitlement. The comments made to the press by Woodhouse were intentionally threatening empowered by a history of acquiescence from a sycophantic incompetent government. Pandering to a stone age mentality improves nothing and helps no one. Fair and realistic limits need to be established for the Queen's children and the pandering must end. We can no longer afford for the tail to wag the dog.
The prognosis isn't good. Exoect Trudeau to run his next election on even more aboriginal entitlement to secure the Canada-loathers vote.
The line that is most memorable for me in this excellent article is, "PET famously - and vindictively - retorted, ‘We’ll let them stay in their ghettos for as long as they want.’"
The indigenous live off others to a great extent and aim to be owners of the land and lords of each manor. All those who favour special rights for this racial group are mischievous at best.
And misanthropic at worst?
Another excellent report and analysis, Michael. Please tell us what we're looking at in that mystery photo at the end ("Front Toward Enemy").
That is a Claymore mine. I thought peopel would generally be familiar with it. It's an anti-personnel mine triggered by a trip wire. It is packed with ball nearings and when it explodes, the ball bearing burst out in one direction. Very nasty device.
Here I will put on my antipersonnel mine ban treaty hat, and note that claymore mines are not covered by the landmine treaty because they (can be) triggered by a “man-in-the-loop” (I.e. command activation) and are not to be used as victim-activated trip-wired weapons if compliant with the treaty. Thus they are set off by solders on watch for enemy soldiers. (All other APMs are otherwise victim-activated, which is what makes this variety somewhat unique.) But you are right that they can be used “illegally” unless altered so that they are not trip-wired. This is what Ottawa treaty militaries are obliged to do if they keep them in inventory.